Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Buck Rogers’

Preface.

First, you’ll need to read some science fiction.  Preferably a lot of science fiction. This is an unfortunately necessary first step and one that can’t really be skimped on. You could try getting by on a little urban fantasy or maybe some paranormal romance, but it is generally a good idea to go with the genuine article.

If you aren’t exactly sure what science fiction is, don’t worry! Most other people don’t have a clue either, but that hasn’t stopped them from reading it!  Just look for the words ‘science fiction’ somewhere on the cover of the book. If those two words are printed anywhere on the cover - front or back – you’ll be in safe territory.  (Not finding those words on the cover doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not science fiction. In fact it probably is. Publishers do this occassionally when they want to actually sell a few copies of a book.  You can read it, but for now it’s best to invest your time with books that are properly labelled.)

You will probably notice that there are many different kinds of science fiction. Don’t let this confuse you. Publishers like to put labels on books so that they can be put into the proper box.  These labels are, for the most part, nothing more than arbitrary adjectives – the same kinds of things you’ll find on bottles of household cleaners, things like ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘new and improved’, ‘lilac scented formula’ and ‘safe for pets’.

While mostly meaningless, these lables can be useful later on, so don’t worry about them now, but do make note of them.

You may also notice that these books come in a variety of thicknesses.  Since you need to read a lot of titles in a short period of time (presuming that you wish to make converts as soon as possible) it would be a good idea to stick with the thinner books.  Right now, thick is in. Book thickness is yet another publishing fad – like straight-legged jeans or flare-legged jeans – and like fashion, this trend is constantly changing. We’re concerned with volume right now, so don’t worry too much about wearing last summer’s bikini, at least you’re wearing a bikini.

The second thing you’ll need is a person.  Preferably someone who is not dead and preferably someone who can read. That’s not a hard and fast requirement – there are audio books, podcasts, movies and even anime versions of science fiction that the illiterate can enjoy, and lord knows there’s more than enough zombie fiction for readers who have passed on – but the ability to read on the part of your intended convert will help speed the process up.

One other thing to clear up before we move on to the actual conversion process. Some people get confused by the names used for science fiction. Here we use the full, formal, term – Science Fiction. Other people sometimes use SF (where the ‘S’ stands for Science and the ‘F’ for Fiction) or Sci Fi or SyPhy or Speculative Fiction or Speculative Literature or Science Fantasy or even ‘That Buck Rogers Stuff’.  Don’t let this fool you. It’s all Buck Rogers ‘stuff’. 

Buck who?  He’s the guy that played Captain Kirk before that upstart William Shatner came along.  Yes, it is way past the time that they should start calling it ‘that Captain Kirk stuff’, but science fiction as an industry is so so much living in the past that we won’t see that happen for at least another century. That is, if the singularity doesn’t happen first.  But we’re digressing. If the singularity does happen, none of this science fiction stuff will matter and if it doesn’t happen, reading about it will have been a waste of time.

So now you need a reader.  This is perhaps the most difficult requirement, as readers are elusive creatures who often go to great lengths to hide their true nature. You may also find yourself fooled by ‘writers’ who claim to be readers (they do this as a fairly successful strategy to lure in readers). Of course not all writers claim to be readers – only the good ones.

The easiest way to identify a reader is to find one holding a book. In the olden days you could usually count on finding people holding books in bookstores, but these days most of them seem to be holding coffee or DVDs rather than books.  You can try a bookstore, you might get lucky. You can try other public spaces as well. Libraries, like bookstores, have a lot fewer people in them holding books these days. Bathroom stalls can sometimes prove to be rewarding, if a bit awkward.  The best advice is – just keep your eyes open and go to places where there are lots of people.  Eventually you will find someone holding a book.

Next – examine the book. You’ll want to make sure that it’s a work of fiction – or at least a biography or history text. People reading non-fiction like “How To Get Rich In Ten Easy Steps” or “Your Political Philosophy Sucks – And You’re Stupid” are unlikely to make good candidates for conversion.  They’re hung up on ‘the real world’ and can’t waste time on make-believe, they need that time to catch up on cable news.

Assuming that it is a work of fiction that your intended convert is reading, you’re just about all set.

Next Week: Popping The Question

Read Full Post »

I’m going to be very, very busy this weekend.

At the prompting of my good friend and fellow traveler in all things nostalgic (Joe), I’m going to be adding a radio show section to the Classic SF Channel site.

Yes – even more Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers, Space Patrol – and some surprises.  (Those guys over at OTRR have really been doing their homework.)

Read Full Post »

After reading the SciFiChannel’s intention to “expand the definition of SF” (so that their channel will appeal to viewers other than “geeky young guys” [or even geeky old guys]) and after writing my previous entry about the death of traditional science fiction through the offices of mass market appeal courtesy of media conglomerates, I decided to take a look at what a REAL science fiction channel might look like.

Of course you’d have to start with product that was already in the can and cheap, which means a return to anything and everything that ran on the tube from the early 50s on (believe it or not, science fiction was one of the original genres embraced by early television broadcasters).

Of course, this isn’t a scientific study.  I have no access to market research that would help determine what kind of audience share such a channel might enjoy, nor do I know how much any of the owners of these properties that still remain in copyright might ask for airing them again.  I’m by no means a professional broadcast programmer.  Heck, I don’t even know if some of these shows are even available for airing any more.

But I do know one thing.  THIS is the channel I’d watch on a regular basis – even if it was only on for background noise.  Sure, some of the shows are definitely hokey and I’d probably flip over to Discovery or History when they aired (even despite the fact that this would be my own channel) – but from the small bit of research I’ve done on the net, every single one of them has a fan base that would love to be able to see them on the boob tube again, so who am I to judge? 

I mean, if every single one of these shows has generated a handful of fairly-well trafficked nostalgia websites (and some have hundreds), and if many of them have annual conventions devoted to their fans, and some of them even have Ebay categories devoted to them – how the heck can you go wrong tapping into that?

Maybe I ought to call it the Science Fiction Nostalgia Channel…

Imagine a click- through to the channel’s website from – every single lost in space fan page; every single irwin allen fan page; every single quantum leap fan page; every single firefly fan page…

Will the audience be 18 to 49 year olds?  Hell no.  It will be 35 to 70 year olds.  Most of whom have homes, multiple cars, many own their own businesses, the majority of this audience has a college degree.  Maybe the Intelligent Science Fiction Channel would be the proper name? Or maybe the “I’m A Parent With Minor Children and I Tell Them What To Watch Science Fiction Channel” would be most appropriate.

The Other Science Fiction Channel?  The REAL Science Fiction Channel?  I think I’ll stick with Classic Science Fiction Channel for now.  And notice, please, that I’ve completely foregone the use of the skiffy abbreviation.  SciFi is something you type when text messaging, or something you hang on a cable channel that features Professional Wrestling in its line up.

Tomorrow I will post my current show schedule.  Below are the names of all of the shows I considered.  What I’ll be posting is just the roll-out schedule.  Please, if there are shows that you think belong that I’ve missed, let me know.  In the meantime, please pass the word.  I’ll be doing the same on the forums I visit. 

Shows considered for the inaugural season of THE CLASSIC SCIENCE FICTION CHANNEL (in no particular order):

Futurama

Jetsons

Thunderbirds

Fireball xl5

Super car

Lost in space

My favorite martian

Voyage to the bottom of the sea

Time tunnel

Land of the giants

Firefly

Dr. who

One step beyond

Outer limits os

Outer limits ns

Night gallery

Twilight zone

3rd rock from the sun

alf 30 102

amazing stories

blake 7

captain scarlet

hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy

land of the lost

rocky jones, space ranger

War of the worlds

Quark

Farscape

Red dwarf

Star trek tos

Star trek ng

Star trek ds9

Star trek voyager

Star trek enterprise

Star trek tas

Tripping the rift

The invaders

Johnny quest

Tales from the darkside

The prisoner

Stargate sg 1

Stargate atlantis

Dark angel

Babylon 5

Tripping the rift

Quantum leap

men into space

Buck rogers in the 25th century

The 6 million dollar man

The bionic woman

Flash Gordon serials

Flash Gordon

space above and beyond

Sliders

the starlost

x-files

Science fiction theatre

The greatest american hero

Space 1999

Battlestar galactica

Alien nation

Andromeda

V

Logan’s run

astro boy

max headroom

Earth: final conflict

UFO 

Starblazers

Exo squad

Akira

 

Read Full Post »

Let me trot mine out so we all know where I’m coming from.  I’ve got a bachelors degree in English Literature, from a fine New England based liberal arts college.  I stymied the English Department there because half-way through my sophomore year, I’d already run through all of the English elective course they offered and in order to graduate with that particular degree, I needed more points in my core curricula.  The solution was to allow me to take graduate-level courses and even to make up some of my own independent study classes.  One such was learning Anglo-Saxon, which allowed me the treat of reading some of the earliest ”English” literature in the original;  I even managed to puzzle my way through some of the Icelandic sagas.

I also spent time abroad, studying at an associated school nestled in the Cotswolds region of the UK, where I was drowned in Shakespeare, Chaucer and Kipling. (The school maintains the C.S. Lewis library, so I had a bit of exposure to him as well.)

I was fortunate enough to have a very liberal faculty adviser.  I was lucky when they drew lots and ended up with the head of the English department, a man who was also a member of the World Future Society, which helped me greatly.  He understood that genre science fiction was literature too, even if the school didn’t offer a class in it, and despite the fact that it was looked down on at the time.   (We were still in the ‘oh, that Buck Rogers stuff’ era.)

I ran a small literary magazine while at school, wrote feature exposes for the school newspaper, received a grant for publishing a science fiction semi-prozine and was generally regarded as an L’Enfant terrible’ of the campus.  I was one of some 30 students selected to attend that overseas school, helped my adviser organize and run a WFS conference that featured Frederick Pohl as the guest speaker, wrote fiction and (‘gasp’) poetry at night and even smoked a pipe for a while.  I had a 4.0 in my core (until a disastrous run-in with a professor who didn’t agree with my views on H.L. Menken.  At least that was her excuse.  In reality she resented the presence of an undergraduate in her class and was apoplectic over my term paper.  I’d proposed to interview several of Menken’s surviving colleagues from the American Mercury Magazine and she never thought I could get the interviews.  Of course I did, but its never a good thing to put one over on your professor.)

I never went on for  my Masters or Doctorate for a variety of reasons, but the above should illustrate that I was educated in at least the basics of literary criticism, had plenty of opportunity to be ‘exposed’ to the seminal works and applied what I had been taught in a variety of different ways.

 The main thing I learned is that literary criticism is a crock.

Calling it a crock doesn’t mean that its entirely without justification or value.  Before you can begin to discuss the merits of one piece of art versus another, you’ve got to agree on the symbols you’re going to use. 

The symbols that have been settled on over the years are psychological, mythological, philosophical and historical.  All of those symbol sets have at least one thing in common – they’re all ‘squishy’ sciences.  They all rely on their own internal sets of relatively defined symbols.  None of them are hard in the sense that you can’t convert those symbols into solid, measurable numbers.

This makes internal sense because the way we react to art is subjective.  The phrase “arts & sciences” itself reflects a clearly recognized divide between the subjective and objective.

All of this is prefatory to my main point which is this:  ultimately, the definition of what is good and what is bad, or what is merely mediocre, comes down to the weight of personal opinion.  Perhaps I should say ‘influential personal opinion’. 

If one could somehow brainwash all of the highly respected critics and all of the academics who supposedly inform our own opinions about what is art and what is trash, what would the result be?  Suppose we were to make them all believe that Peanuts and Buck Rogers were the epitome of literary evolution.  What would they do?

First, they’d go back and find the literary antecedents, analyzing the historical record.  They’d find themes and examples of precursors.  They’d write tomes dedicated to justifications of this, that or the other literary theory.  And all of it would be scholarly, seemingly logical and, to those studying literature, it would all make sense.  High Schools would start offering elective classes in Peanuts and Space Opera, Oprah would pick the ball up and run with it.

There’d be nothing inherently wrong with doing so either because all that would have really changed would have been the nature and value of the various meaningless symbols that were used to analyse everything. 

What would happen on the street?  Not much.  The intelligentsia would happily go along with the new symbology, adopt it as their own and they’d feel smart and justified in turning up their noses at whatever low-brow crap the popular market was serving up.

Low-brow crap would still dominate, both in popular acceptance and economically and the vast majority of people who occasionally read a book, watch a movie or follow a TV show would hardly notice the change. 

Which is why I take issue with the concept of trying to turn science fiction into a “literary genre”.  Those serving the market are barking up the wrong tree.  What needs to be addressed is not what the authors are turning out.  We need to change the symbology that the hoity-toity are using.  If you want to turn Dune into the SF equivalent of Moby Dick, all you have to do is convince a bunch of high school English teachers that it IS Moby Dick and, poof, one generation later it will be. 

Forget changing the genre into what you think the academics will accept and start trying to change the academics.  We all know the genre has already produced some fine literary classics.  This is proof positive that science fiction is already capable of being ‘literary’.  The problem does not lie with the literature itself.  It lies with an outmoded perception of what the genre is.

Besides, its impossible to successfully change the literature.  The academic bar itself keeps changing and shifting; the target being aimed at will no longer be there when the missile arrives.  The best you can hope to achieve is a game of catch-up.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.